°®ÍþÄÌapp

We’re trying something new: five links to interesting articles, blogs, videos, and other resources about evaluation every Friday, every week.

We hope you’ll learn something; if you come across anything that you would like to share, please send a message to calum.davey@lshtm.ac.uk with the title ‘links’ — thanks! Here’s this week’s list:

1. Authors from Cardiff University, with our own Chris Bonell, . With lots of examples, they make practical recommendations, including arguing ‘that … acknowledgment of complexity does not mean that evaluations must be complex, or investigate all facets of complexity’.
2. Along similar lines, the team at Better Evaluation have a  on ‘demystifying systemic thinking’. They cite Professor Thomas Schwandt as saying that our evaluations are happing in ‘post-normal’ times, which is less about straight-forward problem-solving and more about embracing complexity, plurality, democracy, and context responsiveness. The blog refer to a new resource:  that offers ‘offers an alternative way of thinking and planning about evaluation practice and its application to complex (messy/wicked) problems.’
3. In the journal Epidemiology, authors David Rehkopf and Sanjay Basu . The method has been used by CfE member Aurélia Lepine and co-authors to estimate the .
4. On the World Bank Impact blog, David Evans . The book discusses the balance between traditional monitoring and evaluation for NGOs and more recent trends towards impact evaluation.
5. There’s been a fair amount of discussion of Angus Deaton and Nancy Cartwright’s Social Science and Medicine . The journal published a large number of commentaries on the paper, all of which are interesting to read, although counterintuitively perhaps the best way of getting into the debates is to  to the commentaries first to get a sense of the debate.

That’s it for this week! Please do send anything that you would like to share.