°®ÍþÄÌapp

The controversial 'Stop out of Control Drinking' campaign in Ireland which promotes 'responsible drinking' could actually undermine public health, according to a new study published in the journal .

The campaign, launched in Ireland last year by drinks company Diageo, stated it was designed to 'change the country's culture of drinking for the better', and make out of control drinking 'socially unacceptable'.

However, this study, led by the °®ÍþÄÌapp of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and conducted with experts from the UK and Ireland, concluded that the campaign lacked independence from Diageo, and presented problems with alcohol and policy solutions that were unfavourable to public health.

The analysis of newspaper articles, media interviews and social media activity relating to the campaign, also showed that the campaign used vague or self-defined concepts of 'out of control' and 'moderate' drinking, presenting alcohol harm as a behavioural problem rather than a health issue.

Professor , lead author from the °®ÍþÄÌapp of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, said: "The Diageo campaign was controversial from the start, not least because it was initiated and funded by an alcohol company. We were particularly concerned that the campaign emphasised the importance of public opinion about what might work, while placing little emphasis on the scientific evidence already available about solutions to alcohol-related problems. For example, the campaign presented education as an effective way to 'change our culture', though the evidence clearly shows that this has little effect."

The researchers also found that the campaign emphasised alcohol-related antisocial behaviour among young people, particularly young women, when it is known that alcohol harms are a wider health issue affecting men, women and children across the whole population, resulting in the deaths of three people in Ireland every day. 

Dr Niamh Fitzgerald, a co-author from the University of Stirling, said: "Diageo's campaign generally failed to emphasise the policies known to be most effective such as marketing controls and minimum unit pricing, talking instead about culture change, psychological factors and parenting. The language used in the campaign appears to frame alcohol problems as the responsibility of individual drinkers rather than arising from the marketing of an addictive, carcinogenic product.  This tactic has been previously used by the tobacco industry. We need to ensure that going forward the public, policymakers and the third sector can recognise these industry strategies."

The authors acknowledge limitations of the study, including that they had little information about many SOOCD board members' relationships with either Diageo, or with the alcohol industry more generally. This made it difficult to assess any potential conflicts of interest.

Publication

• Mark Petticrew, Niamh Fitzgerald, Mary Alison Durand, Cécile Knai, Martin Davoren, Ivan Perry. . PLOS ONE. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0160379